Duckduckgo browser for windows 710/2/2023 ![]() ![]() I agree 100% with their sentiment but not their strategy/philosophy. I really like their mission and I hope they succeed, but I'm afraid they're digging their heels in and not supporting a lot of stuff in widespread use will keep them on the fringes, or worse yet, kill the project one day. "Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good," is an old saying that I think Moonchild and Tobin would do well to take to heart. They could work on extension that enable support of these flavor of the month web "standards", while keeping them isolated like addons so you can remove them from the codebase if we get our act together and return to sound fundamentals. I think that if the Palemoon guys took more of a pragmatic approach, it would go a long way. I think you see lackluster Palemoon adoption because it is small, unadvertised, and has difficulty with compatibility with things like Google APIs gumming up the Internet, as you pointed out. Almost nobody cares what browser you use or feels exceptionally strongly about this. If somebody would make a browser that was fast, reliable, extensible, small, and JUST A BROWSER, it would get adoption.Īlso note that we're on Reddit. I think there is a latent untapped market for good software IN GENERAL. I'd argue that it would have done much better if it was not objectively bad by all meaningful measures. Sure they decided to bail on it before it caught on, and its adoption rate was dismal despite their strongarm tactics, the fact remains that they still DID IT. Regarding your point about making a new browser: I feel that is defeatist talk. I'm not trying to argue semantics with you, so let's go ahead and say it is different enough to be a totally separate browser. I suppose we could get into a philosophical discussion about how much it has to change before it is considered something wholly unique, but that doesn't seem productive. We agree on the point that Palemoon has diverged from Firefox significantly, but its still a fork, and more like Firefox than any other piece of software. ![]() Websites are now coding exclusively for Chrome's latest quirks like they once did with Internet Explorer except that no one is complaining. What we have now are 2 browsers, each with a million flavors.Īt this stage, creating a brand new browser engine from scratch has about as much chance of success as a brand new mobile operating system would against iOS/Android, and for the same reasons. I've used Palemoon quite a lot, but if we want a better and more robust Internet, what we really need is more ACTUALLY DIFFERENT browsers. Like I said in the OP, you may as well argue that Firefox is the same as Netscape. The Goanna rendering engine it uses is significantly different from Gecko in its current state. It pretty much is at this point, retaining the core functionality that has long been stripped out of Firefox, what with their rabid release cycle and rush to strip out everything that made Firefox unique. Palemoon is a Firefox fork, and while it has diverged considerably, it is a stretch to say that it is a full-on 3rd option in the browser market. I won't be surprised if they've never used a browser before Chrome, or never bothered with customizing Firefox in the version 4 era, assuming they even used it back then. It cracks me up to see people push Mozilla as the great upholder and savior of user choice and privacy when they are anything but. (Just as Firefox itself is a fork of Netscape Navigator, which has been dead for 15+ years, but I don't see anyone making such comparisons)Īnd don't tell me it's because of the attitude of the developers - plenty of popular projects are created or run by people with prickly personalities, but at the end of the day it's the product that matters, you're not there to make friends with the developer.įirefox's own developers can be total cunts when they choose to, going by their treatment of long time Firefox users, and WONTFIX-ing every damn suggestion made. You'd think people would welcome a third alternative that wasn't dependent on the other two or fielded by a large corporation and actually lived up to the original mission statement of Firefox, but no, they keep gleefully predicting its demise and repeating the usual slander about ' old and insecure' or that it's a 'fork'. Firefox itself is shedding features to imitate Chrome, besides casually violating its self declared values of being about privacy and user choice. The browser market is a 2 horse race between Chrome and Firefox. The way I've seen rabid Firefox fans go on, it's as though they object to this browser's very existence. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |